![]() This extra time has allowed us to focus on growing the business. The automation saved us significant amounts of time and dealt with a lot of historic issues allowing us to streamline the business and be massively more efficient. They developed what we already had, transforming it into exactly what we needed.Īfter the initial development we then worked with Arctec to automate any parts that we could. ![]() If the system wasn’t suitable or didn’t work it was our issue. ![]() We were looking at paying a lot of money for systems that had lots of functionality that we would never use and the implementation costs for these systems were high with all the risk sitting with us. We had scoured the market looking to replace our order management system and what was out there was expensive and didn’t fit well into our bespoke business. The system ‘works’ because our main users on a day-to-day basis find it easy to manage, it saves them time and also because those of us who use it less intensely can find what we want without a large amount of effort or training.įor us, the combination of Arctec and Ninox has been a resounding success. If you are like us: a successful small business that has become, to a certain extent, a victim of its own success, with too many different little processes and you find you’re struggling with incompatible information, talking to Arctec would be a big first step to streamlining your business, saving time (and money) and spending more time on talking positively to clients and building more business. The process has been quite long but never really felt long, because we were able to get a basic model up and running relatively quickly, so we could see how it was working and tweak it from there. The system now works excellently for us, but is robust enough to be tweaked and prodded in other directions. 1.I guess that being a small company we could be flexible to suit ourselves and so we ended up doing lots of diverse things and used lots of different excels to manage our business and none of the larger packages fit what we wanted – a cloud-based, flexible database. We chose to work with Arctec based on a short interview where we seemed to be on the same wavelength and within the context of what software firms seem to deem normal as fees, the pricing was more than reasonable. If you’d like to consider another program that could better fit your needs, here are 10 FileMaker Pro alternatives. However, FileMaker Pro also has its cons, like glitches when loading, licensing costs that add up quickly, and a less user-friendly interface than some other platforms on the market. And since it imports CSV and XML files and connects with SQL data, you can incorporate work you’ve already completed. ![]() Thankfully, no-code app builders like FileMaker Pro (now Claris FileMaker Pro) can help your business create an app in just a few steps, whether you need help tracking inventory or organizing projects.įileMaker Pro touts drag-and-drop features, built-in templates, and the ability to create and run apps on both Windows and macOS. In fact, once you tally up the total people hours and technology expenses required to create an app, software development can cost you anywhere between $50,000 and $250,000, according to Uptech. It’s an expensive, time-consuming, and frustrating task you have to turn over to an expert when you wish you could do it yourself. The parts you need might be pricey, but it’s often the costs of the mechanic’s labor that really add up.īuilding an app for your business is like getting your car fixed, especially if you have no idea how to code. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |